Er waren inmiddels voortdurend veel andere spelers bij beide borden aan het kijken (en het was natuurlijk ook een interessante stelling). Dat was de belangrijkste reden om een bord te verplaatsen naar de andere speelzaal (en de arbiters hadden natuurlijk al langer door wat er aan de hand was, maar het nam wel even tijd in beslag om het bord in de andere zaal gereed te maken).

De voortzetting na 23.Le4 in twee partijen op database.chessbase (uit 2016 en 2017) is 23… Pf5 24.Tae1 en nu 24… Pg6 resp. 24… Pf7.

Het toeschrijven van 13… Th7 aan Keres is een loze bewering van Dale Kirton in NiC-YB48 uit 1998. Ausgewählte Partien 1931-1958 van Keres (Ten Have Verlag, Amsterdam 1964) heeft en dergelijke claim niet en meldt keurig, dat Fischer dat heeft gespeeld.

Het was Fisher die de remisevariant bedacht en gespeeld heeft en daarmee de variant gered. Nepo deed het alleen maar na.

Geller – Panno :
[pgn eo=t pd=https://www.schaaksite.nl/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/geller_panno_1955.pgn][/pgn]

Gligoric – Fischer:

https://en.chessbase.com/post/first-anniversary-of-bobby-fischer-s-death

The Argentineans were in panic. But on a free day the temperamental Pilnik had come up with the 9…g5 improvement that seemed to give them a powerful weapon against Keres’ new move. The Argentinean team and their helper spent 24 hours analysing every aspect of the devilishly clever Pilnik idea. In the end the great Najdorf made the decision: we play 9…g5.

This led to the “total chess war” in Gothenburg. Argentina was the second-strongest chess nation after the Soviet Union, and in round 14 chance would have it that the three top players had black against the leading Russians Efim Geller, Boris Spassky and Paul Keres.

About half an hour into the round the Argentinean plan struck like lightening out of a clear sky. Almost simultaneously the three GMs played the fateful move 9…g5, and the Soviet “analysis engine” came to a grinding halt.

The tension in the playing hall was tremendous. Three demo boards showed identical positions, and while the Russians sat there in deepest thought Miguel Najdorf wandered around the hall, merrily asking people what they thought of his position. One of them was Svetozar Gligoric, who was writing chess columns in Gothenburg.

On the boards the sharpest tactician amongst the Russian players, Efim Geller, was the first to play. After 30 minutes he played a three-move combination, sacrificing a knight, offering a bishop and then playing a quiet bishop move: 10.fxg5 Nfd7 11.Nxe6 fxe6 12.Qh5+ Kf8 13.Bb5 Ne5 14.Bg3. Spassky and Keres took almost an hour to find the same moves, which marked the end of the Argentinean dream. All three games were lost by Najdorf, Panno and Pilnik in very similar fashion.

Of particular theoretical note is that the 14th round saw three unsuccessful tries of the novelty 9 … g5 10. fxg5 ♘d7 by players from Argentina when three Soviets tested their sacrifices in the move-order 1. e4 c5 2. ♘f3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. ♘xd4 ♘f6 5. ♘c3 a6 6. ♗g5 e6 7. f4 ♗e7 8. ♕f3 h6 9. ♗h4, so the so-called Vespers – (Argentine or Göteborg) variation – with the main continuation being 11. ♘xe6  11 … fxe6 12. ♕h5 ♔f8 13. ♗b5 – and remained under a cloud for more than 2 years, until Paul Keres suggested the improvement 13 … ♖h7 which was later played in Gligoric vs Fischer, 1958 1/2-1/2 and resurrected that Sicilian, Najdorf (B98) line.

Dat zou kunnen betekenen dat Caspar niet alleen sterker is dan Fischer, maar ook sterker dan Stockfish…

In de link die je geeft verwijst ‘Polarmis’ naar een interview met Gligoric op chessbase, waarin me de volgende zin opviel: ‘So he showed me a game, played somewhere in a minor tournament in Siberia, and asked what I thought about the rook move he was analysing.‘ Ik heb gezocht naar partijen met 13 Th7 in deze variant van tussen 1955 en 1958, maar niets gevonden. Gligoric verwijst dus niet naar Keres.

12.2 The arbiter shall:

(…)